|
|
Meeting, date: |
Geneva, 2004-Nov-16-25 |
|
Source: |
IMTC (International Multimedia Telecommunication Consortium) |
||
Title: |
|||
LIAISON STATEMENT |
|||
To: |
ITU-T SG16 |
||
Approval: |
IMTC Board |
||
For: |
Action |
||
Deadline: |
January 1, 2005 |
||
Contact: |
J. A. Polizotto IMTC Secretariat 2400 Camino Ramon, Suite 375 San Ramon, CA 94583, USA |
Tel: +1.650.328.0194 Fax: +1.650.618.2799 Email: |
|
Please don't change the structure of this table, just insert the necessary information. |
|||
Dear Mr. Campos-Neto,
For a number of years IMTC has been enjoying the ITU-T A.4 status. Now IMTC would like to request to extend its A.4 status to A.5 status.
IMTC is not so much a standards setting organization, but more a standardization complementary body. As an example, we have first specified at the end the of the 90'ies a Specification for “VoIP”, largely referencing ITU-T standards, that has been used by the Industry for a couple of years. IMTC only standardizes topics where urgent Industry need exists currently not covered by Standards bodies. Another example is our interoperability testing specifications that ITU-T might use as a means for enhancing compliance to its Recommendations.
We very much would like to enter a relationship where our specifications can be referenced in ITU-T Recommendations - if needed.
According to ITU-T Rec. A.5:
“3.1 The criteria used for qualifying organizations, as documented in items 1 to 6 of Annex A/A.4 or items 1 to 6 of Annex A/A.6, should be used. If the referenced organization has already been qualified according to ITU-T A.4 or A.6, the evaluation need not be repeated, and only a note of the result is required.
3.2 In addition, the referenced organization should have a process by which its output documents are published and regularly maintained (i.e. reaffirmed, revised, withdrawn, etc.).
3.3 The referenced organization should also have a document change control process, including a clear, unambiguous document numbering scheme. In particular, a feature to look for is that updated versions of a given document be distinguishable from the earlier versions.”
We are confident that IMTC fulfils the above requirements.
Yours sincerely,
Jim Polizotto,
IMTC Secretary